AWARDS
Young Editor:
The Youthful Editor Award honours a young professional's exceptional ability and dedication in the field of editing. This individual has showed exceptional editorial abilities, attention to detail, and excitement for their work. Their commitments have enhanced the quality and impact of distributions in their field tremendously.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Young Editor Award are 10 publications in reputed journals.)
Young Reviewer:
The Youthful Commentator Award recognises the significant contributions of a young expert in the field of investigation. This individual has demonstrated exceptional explanatory abilities, fundamental thinking, and attention to detail. Their brief surveys have provided valuable feedback to creators while also contributing to the overall quality of academic distributions.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Young Reviewer Award are 5 publications in reputed journals.)
Young Scientist:
The Youthful Researcher Award honours a young person's remarkable accomplishments and potential within the logic community. This individual has demonstrated astonishing dedication, originality, and a commitment to the advancement of knowledge in their field of expertise. Their investigative commitments have had a significant impact and appear to be a fantastic guarantee for future revelations.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Young Scientist Award are 5 publications in reputed journals.)
Best Editor of Current Research: Integrative Medicine:
The Finest Editor of Current Research: Integrative Medicine Award honours an editor's remarkable abilities and devotion to Current Research: Integrative Medicine. This individual has demonstrated excellent publishing administration, logical abilities, and a desire to advance in the profession. They have played a vital contribution in shaping the quality and relevance of Current Research: Integrative Medicine distributions across all subjects through their meticulous modification.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Editor of Current Research: Integrative Medicine are 5 publications in reputed journals.)
Best Current Research: Integrative Medicine in UK:
The Leading Current Research: Integrative Medicine Award recognises an extraordinary professional who has made significant contributions to Current Research: Integrative Medicine on a national and continental scale. This individual has showed exceptional clinical expertise, imaginative investigation, and a commitment to progress and comprehending findings. Their dedication has had a tremendous impact on the field of Current Research: Integrative Medicine and has helped many people gain trust.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Current Research: Integrative Medicine in UK are 5 publications in reputed journals.)
Best Review of Current Research: Integrative Medicine:
The Best Review of Current Research: Integrative Medicine Award honours a spectacular audit article in Current Research: Integrative Medicine that provides vital bits of knowledge, a basic evaluation, and a full diagram of a specific range. This survey is notable for its exceptional composition, depth of inquiry, and impact on the field. It has significantly aided in the comprehension and progression of material in Current Research: Integrative Medicine.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Review of Current Research: Integrative Medicine are 5 publications in reputed journals.)
Best Author of Current Research: Integrative Medicine:
The Current Research: Integrative Medicine Award for Best Author recognises someone who consistently produces great investigative articles, academic publications, and influential contributions to the field of Current Research: Integrative Medicine. Their work demonstrates a high level of logical precision, development, and relevance. They have effectively advanced our grasp of Current Research: Integrative Medicine through their distributions and had a long-lasting impact on the scholarly community.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Author of Current Research: Integrative Medicine are 5 publications in reputed journals.)
Best Review Paper of the Year:
The Best Review Paper of the Year Award honours an outstanding survey paper published in the previous year that has had a significant impact on the field. This work is notable for its thorough investigation, basic experiences, and amalgamation of earlier investigations. Analysts, doctors, and professionals in the field of Current Research: Integrative Medicine have found it to be a beneficial resource.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Review Paper of the Year are 5 publications in reputed journals.)
Best Research Paper of the Year:
The Best Research Paper of the Year Award recognises an outstanding investigation into an article published in the previous year that has made a significant contribution to the field of Current Research: Integrative Medicine. This paper depicts ground-breaking investigations into logical thoroughness and inventive approaches. Its findings have the potential to increase knowledge, improve comprehension of results, and affect the future of Current Research: Integrative Medicine.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Research Paper of the Year are 5 publications in reputed journals.)
Best Speaker (Track Wise):
The Best Speaker Award honours an exceptional moderator who has delivered fascinating and persuasive presentations within a specific track or range of interests. This individual has exhibited exceptional communication skills, subject matter expertise, and the ability to captivate and stir a crowd. Their introductions were informative and thought-provoking, and they significantly contributed to the conference or event.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Speaker Award are 10 publications in reputed journals.)
Editor-in-Chief Award:
The Editor-in-Chief Award is a significant accolade bestowed upon a great individual who has demonstrated exceptional authority and publication abilities. This individual has demonstrated exceptional judgement, leadership, and decision-making in managing the distribution handle of an academic diary or distribution. Their important vision and commitment to maintaining high publication standards have led to the distribution's victory and notoriety. They have created a collaborative and thorough atmosphere for artists, analysts, and publication board members as a result of their dedication. The Editor-in-Chief Award honours their remarkable dedication to the advancement of information and grants in their field of expertise.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Editor-in-Chief Award are 25 publications in reputed journals.)
Editorial Board Members Award:
The Editorial Board Members Award honours individuals who serve on the publication board of an academic journal or distribution. These individuals have contributed significant knowledge, experience, and direction to the audit and composition decision processes. Their dedication to adhering to strict publication criteria, progressing through a comprehensive peer review, and fostering the expansion and advancement of the distribution is admirable. They have had a critical influence in shaping the diary's heading and quality through their dedication and joint efforts. The Publication Board Individuals Grant honours their invaluable contributions to the grant's advancement and information dissemination.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Editorial Board Members Award are 10 publications in reputed journals.)
Reviewers Awards:
The Reviewers Awards recognise the significant contributions of those who have worked as analysts for an academic journal or distribution. In evaluating compositions, these individuals have exhibited exceptional talent, basic inspection, and attention to detail. Their constructive criticism and diligent audit preparation have played a vital role in preserving the distribution's quality and keenness. They have made a difference in helping creators enhance their work and develop their knowledge and understanding in their profession by committing to academic quality and peer evaluation. Analyst grants acknowledge and question about their key commitments to grant progress.
(Note: Minimum criteria required to nominate for the best Reviewers Awards are 5 publications in reputed journals.)